comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: orai (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), score (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and ost (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)

نویسندگان

arman ahmadzadeh rheumatology department, loghman hakim hospital, shaheedbeheshti university of medical sciences (sbumc), tehran, iran.سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)سازمان های دیگر: rheumatology department

loghman hakim hospital,

mohammadmehdi emam rheumatology department, loghman hakim hospital, shaheed beheshti university of medical sciences (sbumc), tehran, iran.سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی (shahid beheshti university of medical sciences)سازمان های دیگر: rheumatology department

loghman hakim hospital,

چکیده

background :score, ost and orai risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of bmd tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. in this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women.   methods : 211 post-menopausal women aged 45-88 years enrolled into the study. all of the patients underwent bmd test and divided into two groups according to t-score level. 43 patients (20.4%) had t-score ≤-2.5 (osteoporotic) (group-1) and 168 (70.6%) patients had t-score of > -2.5 (non-osteoporotic). among 168 non-osteoporotic cases, 88 had -2.5≤t-score≤-2 in at least one bony area. these 88 cases in addition to the 43 cases with -2.5≤t-score considered as high risk group to osteoporosis (group 2). afterward, score, ost and orai risk scores were calculated and sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, accuracy index and area under the curve of each tool were determined in both groups and then compared with each other.   results : score had the highest sensitivity compared with others in both groups (95% and 88.2% respectively). moreover, it had the highest diagnostic odds ratio and negative predictive value between the three methods. ost had the highest likelihood ratio and specificity in both groups (71.4% and 75.4%). there was significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of the tests (p= 0.004 and 0.027).   conclusion : ost with the highest specificity and positive lr had a special role in determining the osteoporotic patients and score with the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value had an exceptional role in exclusion of the non- osteoporotic individuals. however, considering the area under the curve, there was no significant difference among these three methods in determining osteoporosis.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)

  Background :SCORE, OST and ORAI risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of BMD tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. In this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women.   Methods : 211 post-menopausal women aged 45-88 years enrolled into the study. All of the patients und...

متن کامل

Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool)

BACKGROUND SCORE, OST and ORAI risk assessment tools could reduce the cost burden of BMD tests by selecting the high risk patients to osteoporosis. In this study we compared the ability of these risk assessment measures to assess probability of the osteoporosis among post-menopausal women. METHODS 211 post-menopausal women aged 45-88 years enrolled into the study. All of the patients underwen...

متن کامل

The male osteoporosis risk estimation score and the osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool for Indonesian men.

PURPOSE To evaluate the male osteoporosis risk estimation score (MORES) and the osteoporosis self-assessment screening tool (OST) score as a means of screening for osteoporosis in men. METHODS Records of 113 Indonesian men aged 50 to 91 (mean, 71) years who underwent evaluation of bone mineral density (T-score) using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry were retrospectively reviewed. The MORES wa...

متن کامل

Osteoporosis risk assessment among rural women using osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA)

Osteoporosis is one of the most prevalent of the degenerative diseases and now recognized as a silent epidemic disorder. With increasing longevity of the Indian population, it is now being realized that, as in the West, osteoporotic fractures are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. The lower bone densities existing in the women need to be screened out as earlier as possible...

متن کامل

Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Primary Osteoporosis

Background: There is increased awareness of the need for cardiovascular (CVS) risk monitoring in the Northern Ireland population in general, and amongst rheumatoid arthritis and SLE patients in particular, who have a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease. No clear guidelines exist for cardiovascular risk monitoring in osteoporosis, and the prevalence and associations of known CVS risk fact...

متن کامل

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
medical journal of islamic republic of iran

جلد ۲۸، شماره ۱، صفحات ۶۰۴-۶۰۹

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023